fix: make the sampling invariant test actually enforce the constraint

The test passed overlay and sampling as separate objects while production
aliases them, so an in-place mutation slipped through it. Also syncs the
telemetry schema page and adds the missing postgres round-trip assertion.
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-31 22:01:51 -04:00
parent cce7562d07
commit 15b9b02e96
6 changed files with 57 additions and 8 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Research Wiki 索引
> 自动生成,更新时间:2026-07-31 17:01 UTC
> 自动生成,更新时间:2026-08-01 01:58 UTC
## design (20)
- [2026-07-20-m1-core-design](designs/2026-07-20-m1-core-design.md) `design:2026-07-20-m1-core-design`
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
- [采样参数透传实现计划(issue #4)](plans/sampling-params-plan.md) `plan:sampling-params-plan`
## schema (1)
- [表结构: llm_calls(遥测 20 字段)](schemas/llm-calls.md) `schema:llm-calls`
- [表结构: llm_calls(遥测 21 字段)](schemas/llm-calls.md) `schema:llm-calls`
## metric (2)
- [OCR 治理调用成功率与错误分类分布](metrics/ocr-call-success.md) `metric:ocr-call-success`
+1
View File
@@ -72,3 +72,4 @@
- [2026-07-31 16:59 UTC] 新增边: plan:sampling-params-plan --implements--> design:sampling-params
- [2026-07-31 16:59 UTC] 重建索引: 50 篇页面
- [2026-07-31 17:01 UTC] 重建索引: 50 篇页面
- [2026-08-01 01:58 UTC] 重建索引: 50 篇页面
+26 -2
View File
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
---
type: schema
node_id: schema:llm-calls
title: "表结构: llm_calls(遥测 20 字段)"
title: "表结构: llm_calls(遥测 21 字段)"
date: 2026-07-20
---
# 表结构: llm_calls(遥测 20 字段)
# 表结构: llm_calls(遥测 21 字段)
## 列定义(冻结,M1 设计 §4.4 / ARCH §7.8)
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ date: 2026-07-20
| created_at | TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now')) | 落库时刻 |
| cached_prompt_tokens | INTEGER | 供应商 prompt cache 命中的输入 token(2026-07-31,issue #3);NULL = 该源未上报,`0` = 上报了真实零命中,两者不可混同 |
| model_reported | TEXT | API 响应体实际返回的 model;NULL = 未上报。与 `model`(配置别名)可能分叉 |
| sampling | TEXT | 本次调用的采样参数 canonical JSON(2026-07-31,issue #4);NULL = 未传。见下方口径 |
## usage/成本口径(2026-07-30,est_tokens 解耦)
@@ -50,6 +51,29 @@ FROM llm_calls WHERE cache_hit = false AND cached_prompt_tokens IS NOT NULL;
`WHERE cache_hit = false` 不可省,理由与上面 cost 缺口口径同源:回放行计入即重复计数。
## 采样参数口径(2026-07-31,issue #4)
`sampling` 列 = 「调用方采样意图 ⊎ 生效源 `extra_body`」的 canonical JSON,空则 NULL。**不含**结构化输出注入的 `response_format`——列名是采样参数,schema 不是,且数 KB schema 逐行落库会让审计表无谓膨胀。补列纪律与 issue #3 两列逐字相同(排在末尾、先探测再 ALTER、失败只逐行降级)。
三个 emit 入口的取值必须各自定死,否则同一列在不同行含义不同:
| 入口 | 调用者 | 有生效源? | 记什么 |
|---|---|---|---|
| `emit_attempt` | RetryMW(最内) | 有 | `merge(source.extra_body, request.sampling)` |
| `emit_cache_hit` | TelemetryMW(最外) | 无 | 仅 `request.sampling` |
| `emit_terminal_failure` | TelemetryMW | 无 | 仅 `request.sampling` |
后两行缺 `extra_body` 是客观事实而非口径瑕疵——它们没有"生效源"可言,与 `model`/`source_name` 在终态行置空是同一先例;缓存命中行亦无损:`sampling` 已进缓存 key,能命中即意味调用级参数与历史那次逐字相同。三者统一读 `request.sampling` 而非 `request.overlay`(后者在 RetryMW 处已被结构化注入污染、在 TelemetryMW 处未被污染,直接用必然三行分叉)。
OCR / embedding 路径的该列**恒为 NULL**:两条路径的 transport 不发 `extra_body`(embed payload 硬编码 `{model, input}`、MonkeyOCR 只发 multipart),故其源在构造期就被剥离——不剥离则该列会记录一个从未发出的参数,那是数据造假而非参数失效。
复现某批实验的解码条件:
```sql
SELECT DISTINCT sampling FROM llm_calls
WHERE session_id = $1 AND cache_hit = false AND error IS NULL;
```
## 埋点位置(单一 helper 铁律)
- `middleware/telemetry.py::TelemetryEmitter` 是全库**唯一** `record_llm_call` 调用点;
+8 -1
View File
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ DSN 走 .env `PGW_TELEMETRY_PG_DSN`,缺则 skip。该实例上有 app/chs_prod
from __future__ import annotations
import asyncio
import json
import os
from uuid import uuid4
@@ -180,9 +181,12 @@ class TestObservabilityColumns:
await _record_minimal(recorder, call_id=_cid("hit"), cached_prompt_tokens=64)
await _record_minimal(recorder, call_id=_cid("zero"), cached_prompt_tokens=0)
await _record_minimal(recorder, call_id=_cid("model"), model_reported="MiniMax-01")
await _record_minimal(
recorder, call_id=_cid("samp"), sampling='{"seed": 42, "temperature": 0}'
)
rows = await _fetch(
dsn,
"SELECT call_id, cached_prompt_tokens, model_reported FROM llm_calls "
"SELECT call_id, cached_prompt_tokens, model_reported, sampling FROM llm_calls "
"WHERE call_id LIKE $1",
f"{_RUN_PREFIX}-%",
)
@@ -191,6 +195,9 @@ class TestObservabilityColumns:
assert by_id[_cid("zero")]["cached_prompt_tokens"] == 0 # 真实零命中 ≠ NULL
assert by_id[_cid("model")]["cached_prompt_tokens"] is None
assert by_id[_cid("model")]["model_reported"] == "MiniMax-01"
# issue #4: PG 侧也须验非空 sampling 能读回原值(不只是列存在)
assert json.loads(by_id[_cid("samp")]["sampling"]) == {"seed": 42, "temperature": 0}
assert by_id[_cid("hit")]["sampling"] is None
finally:
await recorder.aclose()
+1
View File
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ class _DummyRecorder:
cost,
cached_prompt_tokens,
model_reported,
sampling,
) -> None: ...
+19 -3
View File
@@ -193,7 +193,14 @@ class TestSamplingSnapshotInvariant:
terminal = ScriptedTerminal(["not json at all", '{"answer": 1, "reason": "r"}'])
mw = _mw(strategy=NativeSchemaStrategy(), max_retries=1)
await mw(
ChatRequest(messages=_MSGS, structured=Verdict, sampling=caller_sampling),
# overlay 与 sampling 传**同一个对象**,复现 client.py 的别名关系
# ——否则中间件就地改写 overlay 时不会波及 sampling,这条执法就是空的
ChatRequest(
messages=_MSGS,
structured=Verdict,
overlay=caller_sampling,
sampling=caller_sampling,
),
terminal,
)
assert len(terminal.requests) == 2 # 确实重问过
@@ -205,11 +212,20 @@ class TestSamplingSnapshotInvariant:
assert "response_format" not in seen.sampling
async def test_middleware_does_not_mutate_caller_mapping(self):
"""决策 E 的第二条约束: 中间件只能 replace 派生,不得就地改这两个 dict。"""
"""决策 E 的第二条约束: 中间件只能 replace 派生,不得就地改这两个 dict。
同样传同一对象: 生产中 overlay 与 sampling 是别名,任何对 overlay 的
就地改写都会同步毒化缓存 key 与遥测列。
"""
caller_sampling = {"seed": 7}
terminal = ScriptedTerminal(['{"answer": 1, "reason": "r"}'])
await _mw(strategy=NativeSchemaStrategy())(
ChatRequest(messages=_MSGS, structured=Verdict, sampling=caller_sampling),
ChatRequest(
messages=_MSGS,
structured=Verdict,
overlay=caller_sampling,
sampling=caller_sampling,
),
terminal,
)
assert caller_sampling == {"seed": 7} # 调用方的对象未被污染