fix: enforce registered auto reasoning capabilities

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-09 01:22:18 -04:00
parent dda55567ae
commit 4ed144c9e4
4 changed files with 64 additions and 52 deletions
+3 -7
View File
@@ -57,14 +57,10 @@ class TestDefaultProfiles:
assert w.off == {"reasoning_effort": "none"}, name
assert w.effort_key == "reasoning_effort", name
def test_minimax_on_tier_carries_a_tier_value(self):
"""issue #21 的权宜之计: minimax 的""必须真写一个档位值,不能是空片段。
断言反复过一次: T2 按"这些模型默认就推理"的推定把它改成 `{}`,T10 真实
网关实测推翻推定(M3 不发推理参数时 5/5 轮不推理),故逐字恢复旧版的 medium。
"""
def test_minimax_on_does_not_select_a_tier(self):
"""形态不代替模型能力,也不替调用者选择付费档位。"""
w = get_provider("minimax").thinking
assert w.on_base == {"reasoning_effort": "medium"}
assert w.on_base == {}
assert w.off == {"reasoning_effort": "none"}
assert w.effort_key == "reasoning_effort"
+41 -19
View File
@@ -285,16 +285,13 @@ class TestResolveThinking:
get_provider("zhipu"), cap, Effort.NONE, model="glm-5.3", fallback="nearest"
)
def test_phase4_only_blocks_the_off_direction(self):
"""关不掉 ≠ 开不了: M2.x 默认就在推理,开的方向不该被拦。
期望片段 2026-09-05 由 `{}` 改成 minimax 的 `on_base` 实际值: issue #21 把
该段的""改回带 medium(T2 的"开档不注入"是推定,T10 实测推翻)。本用例守的
是 Phase 4 只拦关闭方向,注入什么由 wire 决定,故随 wire 走。
"""
cap = get_capability("MiniMax-M2.7")
got = resolve_thinking(get_provider("minimax"), cap, Effort.AUTO, model="MiniMax-M2.7")
assert got.payload == {"reasoning_effort": "medium"}
@pytest.mark.parametrize("model", ["MiniMax-M2.5", "MiniMax-M2.7"])
def test_phase4_only_blocks_the_off_direction(self, model):
"""已登记 AUTO 只发开启片段,不由库代选 medium。"""
got = resolve_thinking(
get_provider("minimax"), get_capability(model), Effort.AUTO, model=model
)
assert got.payload == {}
assert got.applied_effort is Effort.AUTO
def test_phase4_passes_when_none_is_registered(self):
@@ -351,17 +348,42 @@ class TestResolveThinking:
assert got.payload == {"thinking": {"type": "enabled"}, "reasoning_effort": "max"}
assert got.applied_effort is Effort.MAX
def test_auto_never_trips_phase5(self):
"""`auto` = 不指定档位,可满足性只取决于 wire 有没有 on_base。
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"provider,model", [("deepseek", "deepseek-v4-pro"), ("minimax", "MiniMax-M3")]
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("fallback", ["error", "nearest"])
def test_unregistered_auto_choice_is_rejected(self, provider, model, fallback):
"""有开启形态也不代表已登记模型支持 AUTO,nearest 不可代选。"""
with pytest.raises(ThinkingUnsupportedError) as exc:
resolve_thinking(
get_provider(provider),
get_capability(model),
Effort.AUTO,
model=model,
fallback=fallback,
)
assert model in str(exc.value)
assert "auto" in str(exc.value)
assert "EFFORT_FALLBACK=nearest" not in str(exc.value)
它不是写进 `effort_key` 的取值,故不受档位清单约束。反过来判会让存量的
`ENABLE_THINKING=true`(T5 起等价于 auto)在 deepseek/glm-5.3 这类清单里
没有 auto 的模型上当场报错——设计 §12 明确承诺存量配置继续可跑。
"""
cap = get_capability("deepseek-v4-pro") # (none, high, max),清单里没有 auto
got = resolve_thinking(get_provider("deepseek"), cap, Effort.AUTO, model="deepseek-v4-pro")
assert got.payload == {"thinking": {"type": "enabled"}}
def test_minimax_explicit_medium_restores_old_wire(self):
got = resolve_thinking(
get_provider("minimax"), get_capability("MiniMax-M3"), Effort.MEDIUM, model="MiniMax-M3"
)
assert got.payload == {"reasoning_effort": "medium"}
assert got.applied_effort is Effort.MEDIUM
@pytest.mark.parametrize("provider", ["openai", "qwen"])
def test_unknown_auto_warns_without_promising_effect(self, provider):
messages, sink = _warnings()
try:
got = resolve_thinking(
get_provider(provider), None, Effort.AUTO, model="unregistered-model"
)
finally:
logger.remove(sink)
assert got.applied_effort is Effort.AUTO
assert any("不保证" in str(message) for message in messages)
# —— nearest 映射(fallback 的逃生口)——