Files
PolyGateway/src/polygateway/client.py
T

663 lines
28 KiB
Python

"""GatewayClient: 唯一组装层(D1 组装点)+ from_env/from_settings 工厂 + gather_bounded。
90% 用户三行起步: `client = GatewayClient.from_env(); resp = await client.chat(messages)`。
多逻辑角色 = 每角色调一次 `from_env(scope=...)`;共享限流/熔断状态 = 自建
后端实例(源表取并集)显式传入多次调用——共享必须显式,禁止隐式全局
(VT `evolve_llm = llm` 教训;ARCH §7.7 R5)。
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import asyncio
import dataclasses
import hashlib
import json
import random
import time
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Literal
from polygateway.backends.memory.breaker import InMemoryGate
from polygateway.backends.memory.cache import InMemoryCache
from polygateway.backends.memory.limiter import InMemoryLimiter
from polygateway.config import GatewaySettings, check_hedge_assembly
from polygateway.deadline import ensure_call_deadline, with_call_deadline
from polygateway.errors import PolyGatewayError
from polygateway.middleware.base import compose
from polygateway.middleware.cache import CacheMW
from polygateway.middleware.retry import RetryMW
from polygateway.middleware.structured import StructuredMW
from polygateway.middleware.telemetry import TelemetryEmitter, TelemetryMW, emit_terminal_once
from polygateway.ports import TelemetryStatusProvider
from polygateway.pricing import PricingTable
from polygateway.providers import get_provider
from polygateway.sources import (
AdaptivePacer,
HealthAwareSelector,
LeastInflightSelector,
RoundRobinSelector,
SourceCooldownMemo,
)
from polygateway.thinking import (
effective_effort,
get_capability,
resolve_thinking,
validate_thinking_raw,
)
from polygateway.transports.openai_compat import OpenAICompatTransport
from polygateway.types import (
ChatRequest,
Effort,
LLMResponse,
TelemetryStatus,
_CallContext,
coerce_effort,
validate_caller_dimensions,
validate_request_overlay,
)
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from collections.abc import Awaitable, Iterable, Mapping
from pydantic import BaseModel
from polygateway.ports import (
CacheBackend,
Middleware,
ProviderGate,
RateLimiter,
SourceSelector,
StructuredOutputStrategy,
TelemetryRecorder,
Transport,
)
from polygateway.providers import ProviderProfile
from polygateway.thinking import ThinkingCapability
from polygateway.types import (
BackpressurePolicy,
RetryPolicy,
SourceConfig,
)
def _guard_thinking(
sources: list[SourceConfig],
profiles: list[ProviderProfile],
capabilities: Mapping[str, ThinkingCapability] | None,
) -> None:
"""装配期把不可满足的推理开关炸掉,而不是留到运行时(issue #5)。
与 transport 内的同一次判定不是重复: 那里兜的是"构造函数全量注入"这条路
(CLAUDE.md §4.5 的第二条装配路),而工厂路占 90% 场景,配置错误应当在装配期
就带着指路信息炸掉。`get_provider` 现在就是同一形态的双点调用。
"""
for source, profile in zip(sources, profiles, strict=True):
effort = effective_effort(
request_effort=None,
source_effort=source.reasoning_effort,
enable_thinking=source.enable_thinking,
)
resolve_thinking(
profile,
get_capability(source.model, table=capabilities),
effort,
model=source.model,
# 与 transport 用同一个 fallback,否则配了 nearest 的源会在装配期就被
# 判死,而它在运行期本来是能映射到最近档跑起来的
fallback=source.effort_fallback,
)
validate_thinking_raw(
source.extra_body,
effort=effort,
wire=profile.thinking,
origin=f"源 {source.name} extra_body",
)
def _fingerprint_mark(source: SourceConfig) -> str:
"""单源的指纹标记;`enable_thinking` 与 `reasoning_effort` 仅在**表态时**追加。
只在表态时追加不是省事: 这样只配了 `extra_body` 的存量源字面量与 issue #4
时期逐字相同,升级本版本不会给它们平白来一次全量缓存冷启动。
`reasoning_effort`(issue #20)与 `enable_thinking` 同规则、同理由: 它一旦真正
改变请求体,"把源级档位从 low 改成 max 后重启"就会读到 low 档时缓存的旧响应。
两者取值域不相交(`"none"`/`"low"`… vs `true`/`false`),故追加进同一个列表也
不会把两种写法摘要成同一身份。
"""
parts: list[Any] = [source.model, dict(source.extra_body)]
if source.enable_thinking is not None:
parts.append(source.enable_thinking)
if source.reasoning_effort is not None:
parts.append(source.reasoning_effort)
return json.dumps(parts, sort_keys=True, ensure_ascii=False)
def build_model_fingerprint(sources: Iterable[SourceConfig]) -> str:
"""缓存 key 的模型身份: 多源 scope = 排序去重的 model 合集。
配置级采样参数(`extra_body`)必须参与,否则把 temperature 从 0 改成 1
后重启仍会读到旧缓存(issue #4 设计决策 C)。`enable_thinking`(issue #5)与
源级 `reasoning_effort`(issue #20)同理: 它们一旦真正改变请求体,"关掉推理后
重启"就会读到开着推理时缓存的旧响应。全源三者皆未表态时字面量与历史实现逐字
相同,不触发存量缓存冷启动。
注意本指纹是**装配期**算出的**集合级**身份,覆盖不到逐次调用变化的请求级档位
——后者由 `build_cache_key` 的 `reasoning_effort` 参数单独承担(ARCH §7.5)。
"""
fingerprint = ",".join(sorted({s.model for s in sources}))
# 按 (model, extra_body[, enable_thinking][, reasoning_effort]) 而非源名摘要:
# 语义是"本 scope 会用哪些(模型, 请求形态)组合",改源名不该误触全量冷启动。
# 过滤条件必须与 `_fingerprint_mark` 追加的字段逐项对齐: 漏掉一项,只配了该项
# 的源根本进不了 marks,`_fingerprint_mark` 改了也白改
marks = sorted(
{
_fingerprint_mark(s)
for s in sources
if s.extra_body or s.enable_thinking is not None or s.reasoning_effort is not None
}
)
if marks:
digest = hashlib.sha256("".join(marks).encode("utf-8")).hexdigest()
fingerprint = f"{fingerprint}|{digest}"
return fingerprint
async def _aclose_component(component: object | None) -> None:
"""关闭一个**自建**组件: 优先 `aclose`,退到同步 `close`,两者皆无则跳过。
退到 `close` 是给 SQLiteRecorder 的(它只有同步收尾);内存后端两者皆无,
探测后静默跳过。三个 client 曾各持一份逐字复制的探测代码,收敛为一处是
所有权纪律能被维持的前提——复制即是下一个 bug 的种子(设计 §3.4)。
"""
if component is None:
return
aclose = getattr(component, "aclose", None)
if aclose is not None:
await aclose()
return
close = getattr(component, "close", None)
if close is not None:
close()
def _telemetry_status_of(telemetry: TelemetryRecorder | None) -> TelemetryStatus | None:
"""三个 client 共用的状态取值点: 不提供状态的 recorder 一律返回 None。
判定写成 `isinstance(可选端口)` 而不是裸 `getattr`: 两者运行时都是结构检查
(`@runtime_checkable` 按属性存在性判定),差别在**契约有没有名字**——端口是
写进 `ports.py` 的公开承诺,下游可以照着实现;散落的 `getattr` 不是,而
`aclose` 当年正是被复制成三份鸭子类型探测才漂移出越权关闭(设计 §3.3/§3.4)。
"""
if isinstance(telemetry, TelemetryStatusProvider):
return telemetry.telemetry_status
return None
def _mark_owned_components(
client: Any,
*,
limiter: RateLimiter | None,
breaker: ProviderGate | None,
telemetry: TelemetryRecorder | None,
) -> None:
"""工厂置位所有权(三个 client 共用): 传进来的是 None,就说明这一件是工厂自建的。
与 `RedisLimiter.from_url` 逐字同款——私有属性由工厂标记,公共 API 面不变。
transport 单列: 三处工厂都没有 transport 注入入口,它恒是自建的。
"""
client._owns_transport = True
client._owns_limiter = limiter is None
client._owns_breaker = breaker is None
client._owns_telemetry = telemetry is None
class GatewayClient:
"""统一治理入口;构造函数全量注入(测试/高级),工厂覆盖 90% 场景。"""
def __init__(
self,
*,
scope: str,
sources: list[SourceConfig],
selector: SourceSelector,
limiter: RateLimiter,
breaker: ProviderGate,
transport: Transport,
retry: RetryPolicy,
backpressure: BackpressurePolicy,
quota_full: str = "wait",
circuit_open: str = "fail_fast",
telemetry: TelemetryRecorder | None = None,
pricing: PricingTable | None = None,
text_cap: int | None = None,
cache: CacheBackend | None = None,
cache_namespace: str | None = None,
cache_ttl_s: int | None = None,
structured_strategy: StructuredOutputStrategy | None = None,
structured_escalation: StructuredOutputStrategy | None = None,
structured_max_retries: int = 1,
call_deadline_s: float | None = None,
hedge_after_s: float | None = None,
hedge_max_extra: int = 1,
now: Any = time.monotonic,
sleep: Any = asyncio.sleep,
rng: Any = random.random,
) -> None:
# 入口即校: 装配错误当场报,不等到第一次调用才炸
self._call_deadline_s = ensure_call_deadline(
call_deadline_s, "GatewayClient(call_deadline_s=...)"
)
# 对冲守卫与 GatewaySettings 共用同一份(issue #24 H4): 直接构造这条路
# 不经过 settings,值域/交叉守卫若只挂在 settings 上就会被它绕过
self._hedge_after_s = check_hedge_assembly(
hedge_after_s=hedge_after_s,
hedge_max_extra=hedge_max_extra,
sources=sources,
call_deadline_s=self._call_deadline_s,
origin="GatewayClient(hedge_after_s=...)",
)
emitter = (
TelemetryEmitter(telemetry, scope=scope, pricing=pricing, text_cap=text_cap)
if telemetry is not None
else None
)
terminal = RetryMW(
scope=scope,
sources=sources,
selector=selector,
limiter=limiter,
gate=breaker,
transport=transport,
retry=retry,
backpressure=backpressure,
quota_full=quota_full,
circuit_open=circuit_open,
cooldown_memo=SourceCooldownMemo(now=now),
# AIMD ceiling 尊重源级静态并发上限(独立核验 I1: 不得静默钳制大于 64 的配置)
pacer=AdaptivePacer(
ceiling=float(max([64, *(s.max_concurrency for s in sources if s.max_concurrency)]))
),
emitter=emitter,
# max_extra 不下传(issue #24 H5): v1 编排固定单路对冲,无消费者
hedge_after_s=self._hedge_after_s,
now=now,
sleep=sleep,
rng=rng,
)
middlewares: list[Middleware] = []
if emitter is not None:
middlewares.append(TelemetryMW(emitter, now=now))
if cache is not None:
if cache_namespace is None or cache_ttl_s is None:
raise ValueError("启用缓存必须提供 cache_namespace 与 cache_ttl_s")
# 多源 scope 的 key 身份;源集合或其 extra_body 变化 → 一次性冷启动
middlewares.append(
CacheMW(
backend=cache,
model_fingerprint=build_model_fingerprint(sources),
default_namespace=cache_namespace,
ttl_s=cache_ttl_s,
strategy=structured_strategy,
)
)
if structured_strategy is not None:
middlewares.append(
StructuredMW(
strategy=structured_strategy,
max_retries=structured_max_retries,
escalation=structured_escalation,
)
)
self._structured_available = structured_strategy is not None
self._terminal = terminal # 内部引用: 装配自省/测试用
self._handler = compose(middlewares, terminal)
# 期限到期需要报出 scope(现之前只传给 RetryMW,未自存)
self._scope = scope
# 逻辑调用统计需要同一只注入钟(1.3.5);现之前只传给中间件未自存
self._now = now
# 终态行由公开边界统一写出(T3),故边界也需持有 emitter
self._emitter = emitter
self._transport = transport
self._telemetry = telemetry
self._cache = cache
# limiter/breaker 交给 RetryMW 之后仍须自持引用,否则 aclose 触达不到
# 自建的 redis 客户端(设计 §3.4 记录的现存泄漏)
self._limiter_backend = limiter
self._breaker_backend = breaker
# 所有权默认"不拥有": `__init__` 是全量注入路径,经它传入的一切都是
# 外部资源,关掉别人的连接会弄死共享同一后端的其他 client(ARCH §7.7 R5)。
# 只有工厂在真正自建时才置 True
self._owns_transport = False
self._owns_telemetry = False
self._owns_cache = False
self._owns_limiter = False
self._owns_breaker = False
self._closed = False
@property
def telemetry_status(self) -> TelemetryStatus | None:
"""遥测后端的可写状态;无遥测或注入的 recorder 不提供状态时为 None。
判定收敛在 `_telemetry_status_of` 一处(不是三处各自探测): 三个 client
的 `aclose` 曾各持一份逐字复制,漂移的结果就是越权关闭(设计 §3.3/§3.4)。
"""
return _telemetry_status_of(self._telemetry)
async def chat(
self,
messages: list[dict[str, Any]],
*,
session_id: str | None = None,
parent_call_id: str | None = None,
cache_salt: str | None = None,
cache_namespace: str | None = None,
structured: type[BaseModel] | Literal["json"] | None = None,
stream: bool = True,
overlay: Mapping[str, Any] | None = None,
reasoning_effort: Effort | str | None = None,
tenant_id: str | None = None,
meta: Mapping[str, Any] | None = None,
call_deadline_s: float | None = None,
) -> LLMResponse:
"""一次治理调用(签名冻结,ARCH §5.2;与三项目 LLMProvider 协议兼容)。
`overlay` 是采样参数覆盖层(`temperature`/`seed`/`max_tokens` 等),优先级
高于源级 `extra_body`、低于结构化输出的注入。带默认值的 keyword-only
参数不影响既有调用点(issue #4)。
`reasoning_effort` 是本次调用的推理档位,优先级高于源级 `REASONING_EFFORT`
与 `ENABLE_THINKING`(设计 §4.2)。`None` 是**不表态**(随源级配置),与
`Effort.NONE`("要求不推理")严格区分。裸字符串(`"low"`)也收,在此归一成
`Effort`,非法值当场 `ValueError`——与 `SourceConfig` 那条装配路同口径。
`tenant_id` 与 `meta` 是调用方自定义维度,只进遥测、**不进缓存 key**
(租户隔离由 `cache_namespace` 负责,ARCH §7.5);前者享有真实列待遇
(可挂 RLS、可进复合索引),后者是任意 KV 容器(issue #11)。
`call_deadline_s` 是本次调用的墙钟硬边界(issue #22): `None` = 继承装配值,
正数 = 本次覆盖,**不提供"本次关闭"**。它治理的是**等待**: 到期抛
`CallDeadlineExceeded`,但到期**不等于未产出、未计费**——在途请求可能已发出、
已被上游计费,且清理仍在 `finally` 里完成,故返回时刻 = 期限 + 清理耗时。
"""
if structured is not None and not self._structured_available:
raise ImportError(
"结构化输出未启用: 安装 pip install 'polygateway[structured]' 后重新装配"
)
# 进洋葱之前校验并拷贝: 保护键/不可序列化值在此收口(否则会在 CacheMW
# 的降级 try 之外抛裸 TypeError);拷贝防调用方复用同一 dict 逐次改 seed
# 造成的竞态。同一份快照填 overlay 与 sampling——前者会被结构化注入,
# 后者跨层恒定,供缓存 key 与遥测读取(设计决策 A/B/E)
sampling = validate_request_overlay(overlay or {}, origin="chat(overlay=...)")
# 同理必须在洋葱之外: 洋葱内的一切失败都被遥测层降级成 warning(库铁律
# 「遥测写失败降级不冒泡」),校验放里面等于没有校验——非法维度会变成
# 静默丢失的遥测行,而调用照常发出(issue #11 §4.2)
dimension_tenant_id, dimensions = validate_caller_dimensions(
tenant_id, meta, origin="chat(tenant_id=..., meta=...)"
)
# 同样必须在洋葱之外归一: 档位一路要被 `is Effort.NONE` 身份比较,裸字符串
# 进去会在 transport 的错误路径上抛 `AttributeError`——那不属错误四分类,
# 会穿透 `except ThinkingUnsupportedError` 与 RetryMW 的分类捕获(库铁律
# 「错误分类驱动」)。归一失败是调用方编程错误,抛裸 ValueError 不进洋葱
effort = (
None
if reasoning_effort is None
else coerce_effort(reasoning_effort, origin="chat(reasoning_effort=...)")
)
validate_thinking_raw(sampling, effort=effort, wire=None, origin="chat overlay")
# 期限取值与校验必须在创建 awaitable **之前**: 否则非法值抛错时会遗留
# 未 await 的协程(RuntimeWarning + 资源不释放)
deadline = (
self._call_deadline_s
if call_deadline_s is None
else ensure_call_deadline(call_deadline_s, "chat(call_deadline_s=...)")
)
# 三项校验均已通过 → 进入统计边界(设计 §3: 输入校验异常在边界之外,保持原行为)
context = _CallContext(now=self._now)
request = ChatRequest(
messages=messages,
session_id=session_id,
parent_call_id=parent_call_id,
cache_salt=cache_salt,
cache_namespace=cache_namespace,
structured=structured,
stream=stream,
overlay=sampling,
sampling=sampling,
reasoning_effort=effort,
tenant_id=dimension_tenant_id,
meta=dimensions,
call_context=context,
)
try:
response = await with_call_deadline(
self._handler(request), deadline_s=deadline, scope=self._scope
)
except PolyGatewayError as exc:
# 统计边界内的一切领域失败均尝试写一条终态行(1.3.5 设计 §6 I3),
# 包括已有 attempt 错误行的 RequestRejected / ResultInvalid——两类行描述
# 的不是同一件事(尝试 vs 逻辑终态),由 `event_kind` 区分
await emit_terminal_once(
self._emitter, request=request, context=context, error=exc, operation="chat"
)
raise
except asyncio.CancelledError:
# 尽力而为且**取消优先**: 不 shield、不开后台任务;写入那一次 await 上
# 再被取消则 `CancelledError` 照常传播(与 TelemetryMW 历史行为同款)
await emit_terminal_once(
self._emitter,
request=request,
context=context,
error="cancelled",
operation="chat",
)
raise
# 快照在返回前冻结: 故它含缓存命中路径与已完成的内联遥测耗时
return dataclasses.replace(response, call_stats=context.snapshot())
async def aclose(self) -> None:
"""幂等释放**自建**资源: transport、遥测、缓存、限流/熔断后端。
注入的组件一律不碰——它们可能被别的 client 共享,关掉即越权。
"""
if self._closed:
return
self._closed = True
if self._owns_transport:
await _aclose_component(self._transport)
if self._owns_telemetry:
await _aclose_component(self._telemetry)
if self._owns_cache:
await _aclose_component(self._cache)
if self._owns_limiter:
await _aclose_component(self._limiter_backend)
if self._owns_breaker:
await _aclose_component(self._breaker_backend)
async def __aenter__(self) -> GatewayClient:
return self
async def __aexit__(self, *exc_info: object) -> None:
await self.aclose()
# —— 工厂 ——
@classmethod
def from_settings(
cls,
settings: GatewaySettings,
*,
limiter: RateLimiter | None = None,
breaker: ProviderGate | None = None,
cache: CacheBackend | None = None,
telemetry: TelemetryRecorder | None = None,
registry: Mapping[str, ProviderProfile] | None = None,
capabilities: Mapping[str, ThinkingCapability] | None = None,
rng: Any = random.random,
) -> GatewayClient:
"""按配置装配;显式传入的后端实例即共享(None 项按配置自建私有实例)。"""
sources = list(settings.sources)
profiles = [get_provider(s.provider, registry=registry) for s in sources]
_guard_thinking(sources, profiles, capabilities)
strategy, escalation = _build_structured(profiles)
client = cls(
scope=settings.scope,
sources=sources,
selector=_build_selector(settings.selector, rng=rng),
limiter=limiter if limiter is not None else _build_limiter(settings, sources),
breaker=breaker if breaker is not None else _build_breaker(settings),
transport=OpenAICompatTransport(registry=registry, capabilities=capabilities),
retry=settings.retry,
backpressure=settings.backpressure,
quota_full=settings.quota_full,
circuit_open=settings.circuit_open,
telemetry=telemetry if telemetry is not None else _build_telemetry(settings),
pricing=PricingTable.from_file(settings.pricing_path)
if settings.pricing_path is not None
else None,
text_cap=settings.telemetry_text_cap,
cache=cache if cache is not None else _build_cache(settings),
cache_namespace=settings.cache_namespace,
cache_ttl_s=settings.cache_ttl_s,
structured_strategy=strategy,
structured_escalation=escalation,
structured_max_retries=settings.structured_max_retries,
call_deadline_s=settings.call_deadline_s,
hedge_after_s=settings.hedge_after_s,
hedge_max_extra=settings.hedge_max_extra,
)
_mark_owned_components(client, limiter=limiter, breaker=breaker, telemetry=telemetry)
client._owns_cache = cache is None # 缓存后端可以是 None(backend=none),helper 会跳过
return client
@classmethod
def from_env(
cls,
scope: str = "LLM",
*,
limiter: RateLimiter | None = None,
breaker: ProviderGate | None = None,
cache: CacheBackend | None = None,
telemetry: TelemetryRecorder | None = None,
registry: Mapping[str, ProviderProfile] | None = None,
capabilities: Mapping[str, ThinkingCapability] | None = None,
env: Mapping[str, str] | None = None,
) -> GatewayClient:
"""从 .env/环境变量装配一个 scope 的 client(键名清单见 .env.example)。"""
return cls.from_settings(
GatewaySettings.from_env(scope, env=env),
limiter=limiter,
breaker=breaker,
cache=cache,
telemetry=telemetry,
registry=registry,
capabilities=capabilities,
)
def _build_limiter(settings: GatewaySettings, sources: list[SourceConfig]) -> RateLimiter:
if settings.limiter_backend == "redis":
from polygateway.backends.redis.limiter import RedisLimiter
assert settings.redis_url is not None # 内部不变量: _validate_backends 已保证
return RedisLimiter.from_url(
settings.redis_url,
scope=settings.scope,
sources={s.name: s for s in sources},
global_limits=settings.global_limits,
lease_ttl_s=settings.lease_ttl_s,
)
return InMemoryLimiter(
scope=settings.scope,
sources={s.name: s for s in sources},
global_limits=settings.global_limits,
lease_ttl_s=settings.lease_ttl_s,
)
def _build_breaker(settings: GatewaySettings) -> ProviderGate:
if settings.breaker_backend == "redis":
from polygateway.backends.redis.breaker import RedisGate
assert settings.redis_url is not None # 内部不变量: _validate_backends 已保证
return RedisGate.from_url(settings.redis_url, config=settings.breaker, scope=settings.scope)
return InMemoryGate(config=settings.breaker)
def _build_selector(name: str, *, rng: Any = random.random) -> SourceSelector:
if name == "round_robin":
return RoundRobinSelector()
if name == "least_inflight":
return LeastInflightSelector()
return HealthAwareSelector(rng=rng)
def _build_cache(settings: GatewaySettings) -> CacheBackend | None:
if settings.cache_backend == "none":
return None
if settings.cache_backend == "memory":
return InMemoryCache()
from polygateway.backends.redis_cache import RedisCache
assert settings.redis_url is not None # 内部不变量: _validate_backends 已保证
return RedisCache.from_url(settings.redis_url)
def _build_telemetry(settings: GatewaySettings) -> TelemetryRecorder | None:
if settings.telemetry_backend == "none":
return None
if settings.telemetry_backend == "postgres":
from polygateway.telemetry.postgres import PostgresRecorder
assert settings.telemetry_pg_dsn is not None # 内部不变量: _validate_telemetry 已保证
return PostgresRecorder(
settings.telemetry_pg_dsn,
auto_migrate=settings.telemetry_auto_migrate,
pool_max=settings.telemetry_pg_pool_max,
write_timeout_s=settings.telemetry_pg_write_timeout_s,
)
from polygateway.telemetry.sqlite import SQLiteRecorder
assert settings.telemetry_sqlite_path is not None # 内部不变量: _validate_telemetry 已保证
return SQLiteRecorder(
settings.telemetry_sqlite_path, auto_migrate=settings.telemetry_auto_migrate
)
def _build_structured(
profiles: list[ProviderProfile],
) -> tuple[StructuredOutputStrategy | None, StructuredOutputStrategy | None]:
"""按注册表能力选策略(设计 §5): 全员支持原生 schema 才用 NativeSchema。
json_repair 缺失(未装 structured extra)→ 返回 (None, None),
chat(structured=...) 时显式报缺 extra,绝不静默跳过校验。
"""
try:
from polygateway.structured.json_repair import JsonRepairStrategy
from polygateway.structured.native_schema import NativeSchemaStrategy
except ImportError:
return None, None
try:
native_all = all(p.supports_native_schema for p in profiles)
if native_all:
return NativeSchemaStrategy(), NativeSchemaStrategy()
return JsonRepairStrategy(), None
except ImportError:
return None, None
async def gather_bounded[T](aws: Iterable[Awaitable[T]], *, concurrency: int) -> list[T]:
"""有界并发 gather(D5 便利函数,替代 VT 手搓 semaphore+gather 样板)。
语义与 `asyncio.gather` 默认一致: 结果保序、首个异常上抛;仅增加并发上限。
期限计时从每次调用真正开始执行起算,信号量排队时长不在 `call_deadline_s` 之内。
"""
if concurrency < 1:
raise ValueError("concurrency 必须 ≥ 1")
sem = asyncio.Semaphore(concurrency)
async def _run(aw: Awaitable[T]) -> T:
async with sem:
return await aw
return await asyncio.gather(*(_run(aw) for aw in aws))