diff --git a/app/question_gen/gates.py b/app/question_gen/gates.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..39bce50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/question_gen/gates.py
@@ -0,0 +1,471 @@
+"""轻量四门质量检查 — 对生成题目执行 4 个独立的 LLM 质量门控。
+
+四门：
+1. key_verify: 验证答案在来源素材中有证据支撑。
+2. blind_answer: 无上下文时 LLM 能否答对（若答对 → 题目泄漏）。
+3. multi_true: 检测是否有多个选项可被视为正确。
+4. leak_test: 按家族特定模板探测答题捷径。
+
+设计要点：
+- run_gates 先做 verbatim_ratio 前置短路（> 0.5 直接 FAIL key_verify）。
+- 四门并发执行（asyncio.gather）。
+- 每门加载 store/prompts/question_gen/ 下对应模板，构造 messages，调 LLM。
+- LLM 返回 JSON {"verdict": "pass"|"fail", "reason": "..."}，解析失败视为 FAIL。
+- session_id 必须透传至每次 LLM 调用（遥测关联）。
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import asyncio
+import json
+from dataclasses import dataclass, field
+from enum import Enum
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
+
+from loguru import logger
+
+if TYPE_CHECKING:
+    from app.question_gen.families import QuestionFamilySpec
+    from app.question_gen.postprocess import PostprocessResult
+    from app.tree.index import TreeIndex
+    from core.protocols import LLMProvider
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# 常量
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+_PROMPTS_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent.parent / "store" / "prompts" / "question_gen"
+
+_VERBATIM_THRESHOLD = 0.5
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# CandidateQuestion（Task 5 尚未实现，本地定义，后续迁移至 generator_v2.py）
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class CandidateQuestion:
+    """候选题目 — 出题管线生成、待门控审核的题目数据。
+
+    属性:
+        question_id: 题目唯一标识。
+        video_id: 所属视频标识。
+        task_type: 题型（如 "Action Reasoning"）。
+        skill_target: 目标失败机制编号（M1-M5）。
+        question: 题目文本。
+        options: 选项元组（如 ("A. ...", "B. ...", "C. ...", "D. ...")）。
+        answer: 正确答案字母（如 "A"）。
+        source_nodes: 来源节点 ID 元组。
+        difficulty: 难度等级。
+        subtitle_sentences: 字幕句子元组。
+        frame_paths: 帧图片路径元组。
+    """
+
+    question_id: str
+    video_id: str
+    task_type: str
+    skill_target: str
+    question: str
+    options: tuple[str, ...]
+    answer: str
+    source_nodes: tuple[str, ...]
+    difficulty: str
+    subtitle_sentences: tuple[str, ...] = field(default_factory=tuple)
+    frame_paths: tuple[str, ...] = field(default_factory=tuple)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# 门控结果类型
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class GateVerdict(Enum):
+    """门控判决枚举。"""
+
+    PASS = "pass"
+    FAIL = "fail"
+    SKIP = "skip"
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class GateResult:
+    """单门判决结果。
+
+    属性:
+        verdict: 门控判决（PASS / FAIL / SKIP）。
+        reason: 判决原因说明。
+        raw_response: LLM 原始返回内容。
+    """
+
+    verdict: GateVerdict
+    reason: str
+    raw_response: str
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class GateReport:
+    """四门判决汇总报告。
+
+    属性:
+        key_verify: 关键验证门结果。
+        blind_answer: 盲答门结果。
+        multi_true: 多正确门结果。
+        leak_test: 泄漏测试门结果。
+    """
+
+    key_verify: GateResult
+    blind_answer: GateResult
+    multi_true: GateResult
+    leak_test: GateResult
+
+    @property
+    def passed(self) -> bool:
+        """全门 PASS 或 SKIP 时视为通过。"""
+        for gate in (self.key_verify, self.blind_answer, self.multi_true, self.leak_test):
+            if gate.verdict == GateVerdict.FAIL:
+                return False
+        return True
+
+    @property
+    def reject_reason(self) -> str | None:
+        """首个 FAIL 门的 reason，全部通过返回 None。"""
+        for name, gate in [
+            ("key_verify", self.key_verify),
+            ("blind_answer", self.blind_answer),
+            ("multi_true", self.multi_true),
+            ("leak_test", self.leak_test),
+        ]:
+            if gate.verdict == GateVerdict.FAIL:
+                return f"[{name}] {gate.reason}"
+        return None
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# 内部工具函数
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def _load_prompt_template(filename: str) -> str:
+    """加载 store/prompts/question_gen/ 下的模板文件。
+
+    参数:
+        filename: 模板文件名（如 "gate_key_verify.md"）。
+
+    返回:
+        模板内容字符串。
+
+    异常:
+        FileNotFoundError: 模板文件不存在。
+    """
+    path = _PROMPTS_DIR / filename
+    if not path.exists():
+        msg = f"门控模板文件不存在: {path}"
+        raise FileNotFoundError(msg)
+    return path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+
+
+def _resolve_source_text(candidate: CandidateQuestion, tree: TreeIndex) -> str:
+    """从树中解析候选题的来源节点文本。
+
+    遍历树的所有层级，匹配 source_nodes 中的 ID，提取对应描述文本。
+
+    参数:
+        candidate: 候选题目。
+        tree: 视频树索引。
+
+    返回:
+        拼接的来源节点描述文本。
+    """
+    texts: list[str] = []
+    target_ids = set(candidate.source_nodes)
+
+    for l1 in tree.roots:
+        if l1.id in target_ids:
+            texts.append(f"[L1 {l1.id}] {l1.card.scene_summary}")
+        for l2 in l1.children:
+            if l2.id in target_ids:
+                texts.append(f"[L2 {l2.id}] {l2.card.event_description}")
+            for l3 in l2.children:
+                if l3.id in target_ids:
+                    texts.append(f"[L3 {l3.id}] {l3.card.frame_summary}")
+
+    if not texts:
+        logger.warning(
+            "未找到来源节点: candidate={}, source_nodes={}",
+            candidate.question_id,
+            candidate.source_nodes,
+        )
+        return "(no source material found)"
+
+    return "\n".join(texts)
+
+
+def _format_options(options: tuple[str, ...]) -> str:
+    """将选项元组格式化为可读字符串。"""
+    return "\n".join(options)
+
+
+def _parse_gate_response(raw_content: str) -> tuple[GateVerdict, str]:
+    """解析 LLM 返回的门控 JSON 响应。
+
+    期望格式: {"verdict": "pass"|"fail", "reason": "..."}
+    解析失败时返回 FAIL + parse_error。
+
+    参数:
+        raw_content: LLM 返回的原始文本。
+
+    返回:
+        (verdict, reason) 元组。
+    """
+    try:
+        # 尝试从文本中提取 JSON（可能被 markdown 代码块包裹）
+        content = raw_content.strip()
+        if "```" in content:
+            # 提取代码块中的内容
+            parts = content.split("```")
+            for part in parts:
+                stripped = part.strip()
+                if stripped.startswith("json"):
+                    stripped = stripped[4:].strip()
+                if stripped.startswith("{"):
+                    content = stripped
+                    break
+
+        data = json.loads(content)
+        verdict_str = data.get("verdict", "").lower()
+        reason = data.get("reason", "")
+
+        if verdict_str == "pass":
+            return GateVerdict.PASS, reason
+        elif verdict_str == "fail":
+            return GateVerdict.FAIL, reason
+        else:
+            return GateVerdict.FAIL, f"parse_error: invalid verdict '{verdict_str}'"
+
+    except (json.JSONDecodeError, AttributeError, TypeError) as e:
+        return GateVerdict.FAIL, f"parse_error: {e}"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# 四门实现
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+async def _gate_key_verify(
+    candidate: CandidateQuestion,
+    tree: TreeIndex,
+    llm: LLMProvider,
+    *,
+    session_id: str,
+) -> GateResult:
+    """关键验证门 — 检查答案在来源素材中是否有证据支撑。
+
+    参数:
+        candidate: 候选题目。
+        tree: 视频树索引。
+        llm: LLM 调用端口。
+        session_id: 会话 ID（遥测关联）。
+
+    返回:
+        GateResult 实例。
+    """
+    source_text = _resolve_source_text(candidate, tree)
+    template = _load_prompt_template("gate_key_verify.md")
+    prompt = template.format(
+        source_text=source_text,
+        question=candidate.question,
+        options=_format_options(candidate.options),
+        answer=candidate.answer,
+    )
+
+    response = await llm.chat(
+        [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
+        session_id=session_id,
+    )
+
+    verdict, reason = _parse_gate_response(response.content)
+    return GateResult(verdict=verdict, reason=reason, raw_response=response.content)
+
+
+async def _gate_blind_answer(
+    candidate: CandidateQuestion,
+    llm: LLMProvider,
+    *,
+    session_id: str,
+) -> GateResult:
+    """盲答门 — 无上下文时 LLM 能否答对（答对 → 题目泄漏）。
+
+    参数:
+        candidate: 候选题目。
+        llm: LLM 调用端口。
+        session_id: 会话 ID（遥测关联）。
+
+    返回:
+        GateResult 实例。
+    """
+    template = _load_prompt_template("gate_blind_answer.md")
+    prompt = template.format(
+        question=candidate.question,
+        options=_format_options(candidate.options),
+    )
+
+    response = await llm.chat(
+        [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
+        session_id=session_id,
+    )
+
+    verdict, reason = _parse_gate_response(response.content)
+    return GateResult(verdict=verdict, reason=reason, raw_response=response.content)
+
+
+async def _gate_multi_true(
+    candidate: CandidateQuestion,
+    tree: TreeIndex,
+    llm: LLMProvider,
+    *,
+    session_id: str,
+) -> GateResult:
+    """多正确门 — 检测是否有多个选项可被视为正确。
+
+    参数:
+        candidate: 候选题目。
+        tree: 视频树索引。
+        llm: LLM 调用端口。
+        session_id: 会话 ID（遥测关联）。
+
+    返回:
+        GateResult 实例。
+    """
+    source_text = _resolve_source_text(candidate, tree)
+    template = _load_prompt_template("gate_multi_true.md")
+    prompt = template.format(
+        source_text=source_text,
+        question=candidate.question,
+        options=_format_options(candidate.options),
+    )
+
+    response = await llm.chat(
+        [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
+        session_id=session_id,
+    )
+
+    verdict, reason = _parse_gate_response(response.content)
+    return GateResult(verdict=verdict, reason=reason, raw_response=response.content)
+
+
+async def _gate_leak_test(
+    candidate: CandidateQuestion,
+    family_spec: QuestionFamilySpec,
+    llm: LLMProvider,
+    *,
+    session_id: str,
+) -> GateResult:
+    """泄漏测试门 — 按家族特定模板探测答题捷径。
+
+    参数:
+        candidate: 候选题目。
+        family_spec: 问题家族规格（含 leak_profile）。
+        llm: LLM 调用端口。
+        session_id: 会话 ID（遥测关联）。
+
+    返回:
+        GateResult 实例。
+    """
+    probe_template_name = family_spec.leak_profile.probe_template
+    template = _load_prompt_template(probe_template_name)
+    prompt = template.format(
+        question=candidate.question,
+        options=_format_options(candidate.options),
+        answer=candidate.answer,
+    )
+
+    response = await llm.chat(
+        [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
+        session_id=session_id,
+    )
+
+    verdict, reason = _parse_gate_response(response.content)
+    return GateResult(verdict=verdict, reason=reason, raw_response=response.content)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# 编排入口
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+async def run_gates(
+    candidate: CandidateQuestion,
+    tree: TreeIndex,
+    llm: LLMProvider,
+    family_spec: QuestionFamilySpec,
+    postprocess: PostprocessResult,
+    *,
+    session_id: str,
+) -> GateReport:
+    """编排四门并发执行，返回汇总报告。
+
+    前置规则：verbatim_ratio > 0.5 时直接短路 key_verify 为 FAIL（不调 LLM）。
+
+    参数:
+        candidate: 候选题目。
+        tree: 视频树索引。
+        llm: LLM 调用端口。
+        family_spec: 问题家族规格。
+        postprocess: 后处理结果（含 verbatim_ratio）。
+        session_id: 会话 ID（遥测关联）。
+
+    返回:
+        GateReport 四门汇总。
+    """
+    # Phase 1: verbatim 前置短路
+    if postprocess.verbatim_ratio > _VERBATIM_THRESHOLD:
+        logger.info(
+            "verbatim_ratio={:.3f} > {:.1f}，key_verify 短路 FAIL",
+            postprocess.verbatim_ratio,
+            _VERBATIM_THRESHOLD,
+        )
+        key_verify_result = GateResult(
+            verdict=GateVerdict.FAIL,
+            reason=f"verbatim_ratio={postprocess.verbatim_ratio:.3f} exceeds threshold {_VERBATIM_THRESHOLD}",
+            raw_response="",
+        )
+        # 其余三门仍然并发执行（收集完整诊断信息）
+        blind_result, multi_result, leak_result = await asyncio.gather(
+            _gate_blind_answer(candidate, llm, session_id=session_id),
+            _gate_multi_true(candidate, tree, llm, session_id=session_id),
+            _gate_leak_test(candidate, family_spec, llm, session_id=session_id),
+        )
+        return GateReport(
+            key_verify=key_verify_result,
+            blind_answer=blind_result,
+            multi_true=multi_result,
+            leak_test=leak_result,
+        )
+
+    # Phase 2: 四门并发执行
+    key_result, blind_result, multi_result, leak_result = await asyncio.gather(
+        _gate_key_verify(candidate, tree, llm, session_id=session_id),
+        _gate_blind_answer(candidate, llm, session_id=session_id),
+        _gate_multi_true(candidate, tree, llm, session_id=session_id),
+        _gate_leak_test(candidate, family_spec, llm, session_id=session_id),
+    )
+
+    report = GateReport(
+        key_verify=key_result,
+        blind_answer=blind_result,
+        multi_true=multi_result,
+        leak_test=leak_result,
+    )
+
+    if report.passed:
+        logger.debug("四门全部通过: question_id={}", candidate.question_id)
+    else:
+        logger.info(
+            "门控拒绝: question_id={}, reason={}",
+            candidate.question_id,
+            report.reject_reason,
+        )
+
+    return report
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_blind_answer.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_blind_answer.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d3ca5f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_blind_answer.md
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Blind Answer Gate
+
+You are evaluating whether a multiple-choice question can be answered correctly **without any video context**, using only common sense or option patterns.
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Instructions
+
+1. Read the question and options WITHOUT any source material.
+2. Try to determine the correct answer using only common sense, option length patterns, or grammatical cues.
+3. If you can confidently pick the correct answer → verdict "fail" (the question leaks information).
+4. If you cannot determine the answer without context → verdict "pass" (the question genuinely requires video understanding).
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+```
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_key_verify.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_key_verify.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..57ac54a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_key_verify.md
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Key Verify Gate
+
+You are a quality-control judge for video understanding questions.
+
+## Task
+
+Given the source material from a video and a multiple-choice question with its designated correct answer, determine whether the correct answer is **supported by evidence** in the source material.
+
+## Source Material
+
+{source_text}
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Designated Correct Answer
+
+{answer}
+
+## Instructions
+
+1. Read the source material carefully.
+2. Determine if the designated correct answer can be derived or inferred from the source material.
+3. If evidence supports the answer, verdict is "pass". If not, verdict is "fail".
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+```
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_enumeration.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_enumeration.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..09534cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_enumeration.md
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Leak Test: Option Length Shortcut (ENUMERATION Family)
+
+You are detecting whether a question exploits option length patterns as a shortcut.
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Designated Correct Answer
+
+{answer}
+
+## Instructions
+
+Check if the question can be answered by exploiting the length or specificity of options, without actually understanding the video content.
+
+1. Is the correct answer notably longer or more specific than distractors?
+2. Are distractor options clearly shorter, vaguer, or less detailed than the correct answer?
+3. Could a student "game" this question by always picking the longest/most-detailed option?
+
+If option length is an exploitable shortcut → verdict "fail".
+If options are roughly balanced in length and specificity → verdict "pass".
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+```
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_reasoning.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_reasoning.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0b230ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_reasoning.md
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Leak Test: Frequency Shortcut (REASONING Family)
+
+You are detecting whether a question exploits word frequency patterns as a shortcut.
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Designated Correct Answer
+
+{answer}
+
+## Instructions
+
+Check if the question can be answered by picking the option that shares the most words or phrases with the question stem, without genuine causal/logical reasoning.
+
+1. Does the correct answer have significantly more word overlap with the question than distractors?
+2. Are distractor options phrased in notably different vocabulary from the question?
+3. Could a student "game" this question by matching keywords between question and options?
+
+If frequency-based word matching is an exploitable shortcut → verdict "fail".
+If the question requires genuine reasoning → verdict "pass".
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+```
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_retrieval.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_retrieval.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..caa8cb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_retrieval.md
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Leak Test: Temporal Proximity Shortcut (RETRIEVAL Family)
+
+You are detecting whether a question exploits temporal proximity patterns as a shortcut.
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Designated Correct Answer
+
+{answer}
+
+## Instructions
+
+Check if the question can be answered by simply picking the event that is temporally closest to the question's time reference, without truly understanding the content.
+
+1. Does the correct answer correspond to the most recently mentioned or chronologically nearest event?
+2. Are distractor options clearly from distant time points, making elimination trivial?
+3. Could a student "game" this question by always picking the temporally proximate option?
+
+If temporal proximity is an exploitable shortcut → verdict "fail".
+If the question requires genuine content understanding → verdict "pass".
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+```
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_spatial.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_spatial.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4bbd69e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_spatial.md
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Leak Test: Spatial Default Shortcut (SPATIAL Family)
+
+You are detecting whether a question exploits spatial default assumptions as a shortcut.
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Designated Correct Answer
+
+{answer}
+
+## Instructions
+
+Check if the question can be answered by relying on common spatial assumptions (e.g., "center of frame", "left to right", "foreground") without actual visual understanding.
+
+1. Is the correct answer the "default" spatial position people would assume (e.g., center, front)?
+2. Are distractor options in positions that seem intuitively unlikely (e.g., extreme edges, behind)?
+3. Could a student "game" this question by always picking the spatially default/expected option?
+
+If spatial defaults are an exploitable shortcut → verdict "fail".
+If the question requires genuine spatial reasoning → verdict "pass".
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+```
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_visual.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_visual.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a342dec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_leak_visual.md
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# Leak Test: Visual Salience Shortcut (VISUAL Family)
+
+You are detecting whether a question exploits visual salience patterns as a shortcut.
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Designated Correct Answer
+
+{answer}
+
+## Instructions
+
+Check if the question can be answered by simply picking the most visually salient or "obvious" object/action, without careful visual analysis.
+
+1. Is the correct answer the most prominent or commonly expected element in such a scene?
+2. Are distractor options obviously implausible or uncommon objects/actions for the described setting?
+3. Could a student "game" this question by guessing the most visually dominant element?
+
+If visual salience is an exploitable shortcut → verdict "fail".
+If the question requires careful visual discrimination → verdict "pass".
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+```
diff --git a/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_multi_true.md b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_multi_true.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e020e60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/store/prompts/question_gen/gate_multi_true.md
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Multi-True Gate
+
+You are checking whether a multiple-choice question has **more than one plausibly correct answer** given the source material.
+
+## Source Material
+
+{source_text}
+
+## Question
+
+{question}
+
+## Options
+
+{options}
+
+## Instructions
+
+1. Read the source material and the question carefully.
+2. For each option, assess whether it could be considered a correct or plausible answer given the source.
+3. If exactly ONE option is clearly correct → verdict "pass".
+4. If TWO or more options are plausibly correct → verdict "fail".
+
+## Response Format (strict JSON)
+
+```json
+{{"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "reason": "brief explanation listing plausible options if multiple"}}
+```
diff --git a/tests/unit/test_gates.py b/tests/unit/test_gates.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4329ca6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/unit/test_gates.py
@@ -0,0 +1,312 @@
+"""轻量四门质量检查单元测试。"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import json
+from typing import Any
+
+import pytest
+
+from app.question_gen.families import RETRIEVAL_FAMILY
+from app.question_gen.gates import (
+    CandidateQuestion,
+    GateVerdict,
+    _gate_blind_answer,
+    _gate_key_verify,
+    _gate_leak_test,
+    _gate_multi_true,
+    run_gates,
+)
+from app.question_gen.postprocess import PostprocessResult
+from app.tree.index import (
+    IndexMeta,
+    L1Card,
+    L1Node,
+    L2Card,
+    L2Node,
+    L3Card,
+    L3Node,
+    TreeIndex,
+)
+from core.types import LLMResponse
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Fixtures
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def _make_llm_response(verdict: str, reason: str) -> LLMResponse:
+    """构造一个 LLM 返回值，content 为标准 JSON 格式。"""
+    return LLMResponse(
+        content=json.dumps({"verdict": verdict, "reason": reason}),
+        thinking="",
+        model="mock-model",
+        provider="mock",
+        prompt_tokens=10,
+        completion_tokens=5,
+        latency_ms=100,
+        ttft_ms=None,
+        max_inter_token_ms=None,
+        cache_hit=False,
+        call_id="mock-call-001",
+    )
+
+
+class MockLLM:
+    """可配置的 LLM mock — 按调用顺序返回预设响应。"""
+
+    def __init__(self, responses: list[LLMResponse]) -> None:
+        self._responses = list(responses)
+        self._call_count = 0
+        self.calls: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
+
+    async def chat(
+        self,
+        messages: list[dict[str, Any]],
+        *,
+        session_id: str | None = None,
+        parent_call_id: str | None = None,
+    ) -> LLMResponse:
+        """记录调用并返回预设响应。"""
+        self.calls.append({"messages": messages, "session_id": session_id})
+        idx = self._call_count
+        self._call_count += 1
+        if idx < len(self._responses):
+            return self._responses[idx]
+        # 默认返回 PASS
+        return _make_llm_response("pass", "default")
+
+
+@pytest.fixture()
+def mock_llm_pass() -> MockLLM:
+    """返回始终 PASS 的 mock LLM。"""
+    return MockLLM([_make_llm_response("pass", "evidence found")])
+
+
+@pytest.fixture()
+def mock_llm_fail() -> MockLLM:
+    """返回始终 FAIL 的 mock LLM。"""
+    return MockLLM([_make_llm_response("fail", "no evidence")])
+
+
+def _make_candidate() -> CandidateQuestion:
+    """构造测试用候选题目。"""
+    return CandidateQuestion(
+        question_id="q-001",
+        video_id="v-001",
+        task_type="Action Reasoning",
+        skill_target="M1",
+        question="What does the person do after picking up the book?",
+        options=(
+            "A. Reads it",
+            "B. Puts it back",
+            "C. Throws it away",
+            "D. Gives it to someone",
+        ),
+        answer="A",
+        source_nodes=("L2_001", "L3_001"),
+        difficulty="medium",
+    )
+
+
+def _make_tree() -> TreeIndex:
+    """构造最小测试树。"""
+    l3_card = L3Card(
+        frame_summary="Person picks up a book from the shelf and starts reading it.",
+        visible_entities=["person", "book", "shelf"],
+        ongoing_actions=["picking up book", "reading"],
+        visible_text=[],
+        spatial_layout="person in center, shelf on left",
+        visual_attributes={},
+        subtitle="He picks up the book and reads.",
+    )
+    l3 = L3Node(id="L3_001", card=l3_card)
+
+    l2_card = L2Card(
+        event_description="A person picks up a book from the shelf and begins reading it attentively.",
+        entities=["person", "book"],
+        actions=["pick up", "read"],
+        action_subjects=["person"],
+        visible_text=[],
+        spatial_relations="person near shelf",
+        state_changes="book moves from shelf to hands",
+        subtitle="He picks up the book and reads.",
+    )
+    l2 = L2Node(id="L2_001", card=l2_card, children=[l3])
+
+    l1_card = L1Card(
+        scene_summary="Library scene with a person browsing and reading books.",
+        main_setting="library",
+        key_entities=["person", "books", "shelf"],
+        main_actions=["browsing", "reading"],
+        topic_keywords=["library", "reading"],
+        visible_text=[],
+        temporal_flow="enter → browse → pick up → read",
+    )
+    l1 = L1Node(id="L1_001", card=l1_card, children=[l2])
+
+    meta = IndexMeta(source_path="test.mp4", modality="video")
+    return TreeIndex(metadata=meta, roots=[l1])
+
+
+def _make_postprocess(verbatim_ratio: float = 0.1) -> PostprocessResult:
+    """构造测试用后处理结果。"""
+    return PostprocessResult(
+        options=(
+            "A. Reads it",
+            "B. Puts it back",
+            "C. Throws it away",
+            "D. Gives it to someone",
+        ),
+        answer="A",
+        referent_violations=[],
+        verbatim_ratio=verbatim_ratio,
+        has_time_anchor=False,
+    )
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# TestGateKeyVerify
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestGateKeyVerify:
+    """key_verify 门：验证答案在来源素材中有证据支撑。"""
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_pass_evidence(self, mock_llm_pass: MockLLM) -> None:
+        """LLM 确认有证据 → PASS。"""
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        tree = _make_tree()
+        result = await _gate_key_verify(candidate, tree, mock_llm_pass, session_id="test-session")
+        assert result.verdict == GateVerdict.PASS
+        assert mock_llm_pass.calls  # 确认调用了 LLM
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_fail_no_evidence(self, mock_llm_fail: MockLLM) -> None:
+        """LLM 判断无证据 → FAIL。"""
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        tree = _make_tree()
+        result = await _gate_key_verify(candidate, tree, mock_llm_fail, session_id="test-session")
+        assert result.verdict == GateVerdict.FAIL
+        assert "no evidence" in result.reason
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# TestGateBlindAnswer
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestGateBlindAnswer:
+    """blind_answer 门：无上下文答对 → FAIL（题目太简单/泄漏）。"""
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_pass_wrong(self) -> None:
+        """LLM 在无上下文时答错 → PASS（题目确实需要视频信息）。"""
+        # LLM 返回 "pass" 表示它无法正确回答
+        llm = MockLLM([_make_llm_response("pass", "cannot determine without context")])
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        result = await _gate_blind_answer(candidate, llm, session_id="test-session")
+        assert result.verdict == GateVerdict.PASS
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_fail_correct(self) -> None:
+        """LLM 在无上下文时答对 → FAIL（题目泄漏）。"""
+        llm = MockLLM([_make_llm_response("fail", "answer is obvious from options")])
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        result = await _gate_blind_answer(candidate, llm, session_id="test-session")
+        assert result.verdict == GateVerdict.FAIL
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# TestGateMultiTrue
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestGateMultiTrue:
+    """multi_true 门：多选项正确 → FAIL。"""
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_pass_single(self) -> None:
+        """只有一个正确选项 → PASS。"""
+        llm = MockLLM([_make_llm_response("pass", "only one correct answer")])
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        tree = _make_tree()
+        result = await _gate_multi_true(candidate, tree, llm, session_id="test-session")
+        assert result.verdict == GateVerdict.PASS
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_fail_multi(self) -> None:
+        """多个选项可被视为正确 → FAIL。"""
+        llm = MockLLM([_make_llm_response("fail", "options A and B are both plausible")])
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        tree = _make_tree()
+        result = await _gate_multi_true(candidate, tree, llm, session_id="test-session")
+        assert result.verdict == GateVerdict.FAIL
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# TestGateLeakTest
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestGateLeakTest:
+    """leak_test 门：按家族模板执行泄漏探测。"""
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_per_family_template(self) -> None:
+        """使用家族特定的 probe_template 调用 LLM。"""
+        llm = MockLLM([_make_llm_response("pass", "no shortcut detected")])
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        result = await _gate_leak_test(candidate, RETRIEVAL_FAMILY, llm, session_id="test-session")
+        assert result.verdict == GateVerdict.PASS
+        # 验证 session_id 被正确传递
+        assert llm.calls[0]["session_id"] == "test-session"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# TestRunGates
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestRunGates:
+    """run_gates 编排：并发四门 + verbatim 短路。"""
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_all_pass(self) -> None:
+        """四门全 PASS → GateReport.passed=True。"""
+        llm = MockLLM([_make_llm_response("pass", f"gate {i} ok") for i in range(4)])
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        tree = _make_tree()
+        postprocess = _make_postprocess(verbatim_ratio=0.1)
+
+        report = await run_gates(
+            candidate=candidate,
+            tree=tree,
+            llm=llm,
+            family_spec=RETRIEVAL_FAMILY,
+            postprocess=postprocess,
+            session_id="test-session",
+        )
+        assert report.passed is True
+        assert report.reject_reason is None
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio()
+    async def test_high_verbatim_shortcircuits(self) -> None:
+        """verbatim_ratio > 0.5 → key_verify 直接 FAIL，不调用 LLM。"""
+        llm = MockLLM([_make_llm_response("pass", "should not be called")])
+        candidate = _make_candidate()
+        tree = _make_tree()
+        postprocess = _make_postprocess(verbatim_ratio=0.8)
+
+        report = await run_gates(
+            candidate=candidate,
+            tree=tree,
+            llm=llm,
+            family_spec=RETRIEVAL_FAMILY,
+            postprocess=postprocess,
+            session_id="test-session",
+        )
+        assert report.passed is False
+        assert report.key_verify.verdict == GateVerdict.FAIL
+        assert "verbatim" in report.key_verify.reason.lower()