f958138e83
Telemetry degradation used to be a single warning and a private boolean. In a long-running process that is indistinguishable from telemetry working: issue #15 was only found by hand-reconciling milestone log lines against llm_calls rows, after 19 calls had silently gone unrecorded. The SQLite side was worse — once init failed, every write returned without even a log line. Degradation now has one shared owner. TelemetryStatusTracker holds the state machine (enter/recover/drop/should-retry), announces entry and recovery once each, and repeats the drop count under a row-and-time double threshold so a degraded backend neither floods the log nor goes quiet. Both recorders hold one; both count the rows they drop. For programmatic consumers, TelemetryStatus is a frozen snapshot exposed as telemetry_status on all three clients, resolved through a single isinstance check. It is a separate optional port rather than a member of TelemetryRecorder: that protocol is @runtime_checkable, so adding an attribute would make every implementation that only defines record_llm_call stop satisfying it — downstream isinstance assertions would break on upgrade. The existing assertion in test_ports.py is what keeps that decision honest. Failure criteria are deliberately untouched here: Postgres still treats a pool failure as permanent, only now visibly. `_failed` and the tracker therefore both carry the verdict for the span of this one change; the cooldown rework collapses them into the tracker alone.
302 lines
9.5 KiB
Python
302 lines
9.5 KiB
Python
"""全部端口协议与治理快照类型(M1 设计 §4;最内层,只依赖 types/errors/标准库)。
|
||
|
||
决策逻辑与状态存储分离(D3): 中间件只面向这里的 Protocol,
|
||
后端(memory/redis)各自实现同一契约并共用一套契约测试。
|
||
时间量纲一律**秒**(CHS Redis 实现内部的毫秒换算是后端私事,不进契约)。
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
from collections.abc import Awaitable, Callable
|
||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||
from enum import StrEnum
|
||
from typing import Any, Protocol, runtime_checkable
|
||
|
||
from .types import (
|
||
ChatRequest,
|
||
EmbeddingTransportResult,
|
||
LLMResponse,
|
||
OcrLayoutResult,
|
||
OcrLayoutTransportResult,
|
||
OcrTextResult,
|
||
OcrTextTransportResult,
|
||
SourceConfig,
|
||
SourceStats,
|
||
TelemetryStatus,
|
||
TransportResult,
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
CallNext = Callable[[ChatRequest], Awaitable[LLMResponse]]
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class Middleware(Protocol):
|
||
"""洋葱层: 包裹 call_next,层与层正交(D1)。"""
|
||
|
||
async def __call__(self, request: ChatRequest, call_next: CallNext) -> LLMResponse: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class Transport(Protocol):
|
||
"""一次原始调用的协议细节(请求组装/流式解析/错误翻译);不含任何治理。"""
|
||
|
||
async def complete(
|
||
self,
|
||
*,
|
||
messages: list[dict[str, Any]],
|
||
source: SourceConfig,
|
||
stream: bool,
|
||
overlay: dict[str, Any],
|
||
call_id: str,
|
||
) -> TransportResult: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class EmbeddingTransport(Protocol):
|
||
"""一次原始 embedding 调用的协议细节(M2 §7);不含任何治理。"""
|
||
|
||
async def embed(
|
||
self, *, texts: list[str], source: SourceConfig, call_id: str
|
||
) -> EmbeddingTransportResult: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class OcrTextPort(Protocol):
|
||
"""OCR 文本转录端口(D9;对应 MonkeyOCR POST /ocr/text)。"""
|
||
|
||
async def recognize_text(self, image: bytes) -> OcrTextResult: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class OcrLayoutPort(Protocol):
|
||
"""OCR 版面解析端口(D9;对应 MonkeyOCR POST /parse → GET ZIP)。"""
|
||
|
||
async def parse_layout(self, image: bytes) -> OcrLayoutResult: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class OcrTransport(Protocol):
|
||
"""一次原始 OCR 调用的协议细节(M3 设计 §3.2);不含任何治理。
|
||
|
||
check_health 是探测不是调用: 2xx → True,异常 → False,
|
||
CancelledError 穿透;由消费方(启动门)决定成败语义。
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
async def recognize_text(
|
||
self, *, image: bytes, source: SourceConfig, call_id: str
|
||
) -> OcrTextTransportResult: ...
|
||
|
||
async def parse_layout(
|
||
self, *, image: bytes, source: SourceConfig, call_id: str
|
||
) -> OcrLayoutTransportResult: ...
|
||
|
||
async def check_health(self, *, source: SourceConfig) -> bool: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class Permit(Protocol):
|
||
"""限流入场许可;settle/release 均幂等,finally 中必然执行。"""
|
||
|
||
async def release(self) -> None: ...
|
||
|
||
async def settle(self, actual_tokens: int) -> None: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class RateLimiter(Protocol):
|
||
"""限流契约(CHS limiter.py 形态): 并发/RPM/TPM × 全局/单源 六道闸。"""
|
||
|
||
async def try_acquire(self, source_key: str, est_tokens: int) -> Permit | None: ...
|
||
|
||
async def acquire(self, source_key: str, est_tokens: int) -> Permit: ...
|
||
|
||
async def source_stats(self, source_key: str) -> SourceStats: ...
|
||
|
||
async def mark_progress(self) -> None: ...
|
||
|
||
async def progress_age_s(self) -> float: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
class GateState(StrEnum):
|
||
"""熔断状态机三态。"""
|
||
|
||
CLOSED = "closed"
|
||
OPEN = "open"
|
||
HALF_OPEN = "half_open"
|
||
|
||
|
||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||
class GateDecision:
|
||
"""一次源准入决定,同时是结果写回所需的 fencing token(CHS ports.py:405)。"""
|
||
|
||
source_name: str
|
||
allowed: bool
|
||
state: GateState
|
||
epoch: int
|
||
is_probe: bool
|
||
probe_owner: str | None
|
||
retry_after_s: float
|
||
|
||
def __post_init__(self) -> None:
|
||
# 校验逐条移植 CHS ports.py:405-440,保证快照内部一致
|
||
self._check_bounds()
|
||
self._check_admission()
|
||
self._check_probe()
|
||
|
||
def _check_bounds(self) -> None:
|
||
if not self.source_name.strip():
|
||
raise ValueError("source_name 不能为空")
|
||
if self.epoch < 0:
|
||
raise ValueError("epoch 不能为负")
|
||
if self.retry_after_s < 0:
|
||
raise ValueError("retry_after_s 不能为负")
|
||
|
||
def _check_admission(self) -> None:
|
||
if self.allowed and self.state is GateState.OPEN:
|
||
raise ValueError("OPEN 状态不得准入")
|
||
if self.allowed and self.state is GateState.HALF_OPEN and not self.is_probe:
|
||
raise ValueError("HALF_OPEN 准入必须是探针")
|
||
|
||
def _check_probe(self) -> None:
|
||
if self.is_probe:
|
||
probe_valid = (
|
||
self.allowed
|
||
and self.state is GateState.HALF_OPEN
|
||
and self.probe_owner is not None
|
||
and bool(self.probe_owner.strip())
|
||
)
|
||
if not probe_valid:
|
||
raise ValueError("探针决定必须同时包含准入、HALF_OPEN 与 owner")
|
||
elif self.probe_owner is not None:
|
||
raise ValueError("非探针决定不得携带 probe_owner")
|
||
|
||
|
||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||
class GateUpdate:
|
||
"""门控写回快照;applied=False 表示 fencing 已拒绝迟到结果(CHS ports.py:442)。"""
|
||
|
||
applied: bool
|
||
state: GateState
|
||
epoch: int
|
||
failure_count: int
|
||
retry_after_s: float
|
||
|
||
def __post_init__(self) -> None:
|
||
if self.epoch < 0 or self.failure_count < 0 or self.retry_after_s < 0:
|
||
raise ValueError("门控更新快照不能包含负数")
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class ProviderGate(Protocol):
|
||
"""熔断契约(CHS provider_gate.py 形态): 半开单探针租约 + epoch fencing 在契约内。"""
|
||
|
||
async def try_enter(self, source_name: str, owner: str) -> GateDecision: ...
|
||
|
||
async def record_success(
|
||
self, entry: GateDecision, *, count_attempt: bool = True
|
||
) -> GateUpdate: ...
|
||
|
||
async def record_failure(
|
||
self, entry: GateDecision, reason: str, force_open: bool
|
||
) -> GateUpdate: ...
|
||
|
||
async def release_probe(self, entry: GateDecision) -> GateUpdate: ...
|
||
|
||
async def retry_after_s(self, sources: tuple[str, ...]) -> float: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class CacheBackend(Protocol):
|
||
"""响应缓存后端: 笨 KV;key 公式归 CacheMW(算法一份)。"""
|
||
|
||
async def get(self, key: str) -> str | None: ...
|
||
|
||
async def set(self, key: str, value: str, ttl_s: int) -> None: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class SourceSelector(Protocol):
|
||
"""选源策略(CHS selector.py 形态): 返回本次尝试的候选顺序。"""
|
||
|
||
def order(
|
||
self, sources: list[SourceConfig], stats: dict[str, SourceStats]
|
||
) -> list[SourceConfig]: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class OutcomeAwareSelector(Protocol):
|
||
"""可选选源器扩展(M2.5 设计 §3.2): 消费尝试结果以维护健康视图。
|
||
|
||
RetryMW 构造时 isinstance 判定一次;非本 Protocol 的选源器不受影响。
|
||
喂数口径: 真实成功 ok=True;Transient/SourceDead/429 ok=False;
|
||
ResultInvalid 与"网关健康拒坏请求"不喂(坏结果 ≠ 坏服务)。
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
def record_outcome(self, source_name: str, ok: bool) -> None: ...
|
||
|
||
def health(self, source_name: str) -> float: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class StructuredOutputStrategy(Protocol):
|
||
"""结构化输出策略(D7/D14): 请求侧叠加 + 响应侧解析。"""
|
||
|
||
def request_overlay(self, schema: dict[str, Any] | None) -> dict[str, Any]: ...
|
||
|
||
def parse(self, text: str) -> Any: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class TelemetryStatusProvider(Protocol):
|
||
"""可自述可写状态的遥测后端;`TelemetryRecorder` 的**可选**伴生端口(issue #15)。
|
||
|
||
与 `TelemetryRecorder` 分开而不是给它加成员,是因为后者是 `@runtime_checkable`
|
||
而运行时检查按属性存在性做: 加一个属性会让所有只实现 `record_llm_call` 的
|
||
实现**当场不再是** `TelemetryRecorder`,下游若有同款 isinstance 断言,升级即断
|
||
(设计 §3.3)。消费方一律先 isinstance 再取值,取不到就当没有状态可报。
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
@property
|
||
def telemetry_status(self) -> TelemetryStatus: ...
|
||
|
||
|
||
@runtime_checkable
|
||
class TelemetryRecorder(Protocol):
|
||
"""遥测后端;24 字段冻结(M1 设计 §4.4 + issue #3/#4/#11),唯一调用点是 TelemetryEmitter。
|
||
|
||
新增参数不设默认值: 库外无第三方实现者(三项目迁移时删除了各自的同名
|
||
Protocol),完整签名的成本为零,而少写一列会被 emitter 的降级吞成 warning。
|
||
|
||
`tenant_id` 与 `meta` 到达 recorder 时**已由 emitter 归一化**——`tenant_id`
|
||
的 `None` 已转空串,`meta` 已序列化为 JSON 字符串(空 dict 为 `'{}'`)。
|
||
recorder 只负责落库,不做任何语义判断,与 `sampling` 列由
|
||
`canonical_sampling_json()` 在 emitter 侧定型是同一先例。
|
||
"""
|
||
|
||
async def record_llm_call(
|
||
self,
|
||
*,
|
||
call_id: str,
|
||
parent_call_id: str | None,
|
||
session_id: str | None,
|
||
model: str,
|
||
provider: str,
|
||
source_name: str,
|
||
messages: str,
|
||
response: str,
|
||
thinking: str,
|
||
prompt_tokens: int,
|
||
completion_tokens: int,
|
||
usage_source: str,
|
||
latency_ms: int,
|
||
ttft_ms: float | None,
|
||
max_inter_token_ms: float | None,
|
||
cache_hit: bool,
|
||
error: str | None,
|
||
cost: float | None,
|
||
cached_prompt_tokens: int | None,
|
||
model_reported: str | None,
|
||
sampling: str | None,
|
||
reasoning_tokens: int | None,
|
||
tenant_id: str,
|
||
meta: str,
|
||
) -> None: ...
|