Files
Video-Tree-TRM5/.claude/skills/writing-plans/plan-document-reviewer-prompt.md
T
iomgaa 6bdb802f01 chore: track claude skills, tools, templates, reference code and research-wiki
- Add all claude skills (brainstorming, commit, debugging, TDD, etc.)
- Add claude hooks (pre-commit-guard, post-edit-quality)
- Add research templates (experiment plan, research brief, etc.)
- Add claude tools (arxiv/semantic_scholar/openalex fetch, wiki, exa)
- Add TRM4 reference implementation as algorithm fidelity baseline
- Add research-wiki content (plans, index, graph, query_pack)
- Update .gitignore to exclude .graphify_version runtime state
2026-07-06 20:59:03 -04:00

49 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown

# Plan Document Reviewer Prompt Template
Use this template when dispatching a plan document reviewer subagent.
**Purpose:** Verify the plan is complete, matches the spec, and has proper task decomposition.
**Dispatch after:** The complete plan is written.
```
Task tool (general-purpose):
description: "Review plan document"
prompt: |
You are a plan document reviewer. Verify this plan is complete and ready for implementation.
**Plan to review:** [PLAN_FILE_PATH]
**Spec for reference:** [SPEC_FILE_PATH]
## What to Check
| Category | What to Look For |
|----------|------------------|
| Completeness | TODOs, placeholders, incomplete tasks, missing steps |
| Spec Alignment | Plan covers spec requirements, no major scope creep |
| Task Decomposition | Tasks have clear boundaries, steps are actionable |
| Buildability | Could an engineer follow this plan without getting stuck? |
## Calibration
**Only flag issues that would cause real problems during implementation.**
An implementer building the wrong thing or getting stuck is an issue.
Minor wording, stylistic preferences, and "nice to have" suggestions are not.
Approve unless there are serious gaps — missing requirements from the spec,
contradictory steps, placeholder content, or tasks so vague they can't be acted on.
## Output Format
## Plan Review
**Status:** Approved | Issues Found
**Issues (if any):**
- [Task X, Step Y]: [specific issue] - [why it matters for implementation]
**Recommendations (advisory, do not block approval):**
- [suggestions for improvement]
```
**Reviewer returns:** Status, Issues (if any), Recommendations